|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4096 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Nov 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The Aussies are trialling a couple of new rules in the upcoming All Stars game. I like the 20/40 rule, could have some mileage:
The All Stars game will feature an innovative "power play", in which each captain can nominate a five-minute period in both halves, where the opposing side must drop two players.
The defending team will nominate which of their players must leave the field and if the team that has called the power play scores a try in that five minute period, the power play will end immediately.
The two teams cannot call a power play simultaneously.
In another innovation, infringements in the ruck area will lead to an immediate restart of the tackle count, as opposed to a kick for touch.
The 40-20 rule has been expanded to include 20-40 kicks in play.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 29216 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I don't mind the 20-40 kicks as it's just the same as 40-20, but the power play idea seems like making changes for the sake of it.
It might make a close game exciting, but what use would it be in a blow out game?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32367 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'm assuming you have to replace two players from the subs bench, otherwise it would be 13 v 11.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 29216 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Rogues Gallery="Rogues Gallery"I'm assuming you have to replace two players from the subs bench, otherwise it would be 13 v 11.'"
What difference would that make? Surely it's just taking two players off the team for 5 minutes to give the team with the Power Play the chance to score?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32367 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Saddened!="Saddened!"What difference would that make? Surely it's just taking two players off the team for 5 minutes to give the team with the Power Play the chance to score?'"
I would have thought that getting rid of a teams two best players for 10 minutes would be a big enough advantage.
Edit,
I've misread it. It's the defending team who decides which players get removed.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1083 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2017 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Rogues Gallery="Rogues Gallery"I would have thought that getting rid of a teams two best players for 10 minutes would be a big enough advantage.
=#FF4000Edit,
I've misread it. It's the defending team who decides which players get removed.'"
As usual 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32367 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Benidorm John="Benidorm John"As usual
'"
BJ at least I admit it when I am OCCASIONALLY wrong, unlike some on here. 
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 4411 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2024 | Apr 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Does Australia operate on a different calendar? Is it April 1st over there?
I think this is quite probably the most stupid idea I've ever heard.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 2794 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2016 | Jun 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Awful, if true.
The 'powerplay' is a nonsense gimmick, and risks us looking more like a 'Gladiators' type novelty game than a serious sport. No, no, no, no, no.
My worry about the 20/40 is that it could encourage a lot of RU-like kicking for territory by the FB when fielding a kick and I'd rather see the ball kept in hand.
I could live with the 20/40 if I had to, but would hate for us to turn into gameshow with the introduction of 'powerplay'.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 27757 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2021 | May 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Powerplay idea is just silly. Kick thing is fine although I thought they might have gone 50/10 which makes more sense than 20/40.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14094 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2019 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Cragganmore Kid="Cragganmore Kid"Awful, if true.
The 'powerplay' is a nonsense gimmick, and risks us looking more like a 'Gladiators' type novelty game than a serious sport. No, no, no, no, no.
My worry about the 20/40 is that it could encourage a lot of RU-like kicking for territory by the FB when fielding a kick and I'd rather see the ball kept in hand.
I could live with the 20/40 if I had to, but would hate for us to turn into gameshow with the introduction of 'powerplay'.'"
I agree fully, neither idea improves the game.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 16963 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Cragganmore Kid="Cragganmore Kid"Awful, if true.
The 'powerplay' is a nonsense gimmick, and risks us looking more like a 'Gladiators' type novelty game than a serious sport. No, no, no, no, no.
My worry about the 20/40 is that it could encourage a lot of RU-like kicking for territory by the FB when fielding a kick and I'd rather see the ball kept in hand.
I could live with the 20/40 if I had to, but would hate for us to turn into gameshow with the introduction of 'powerplay'.'"
I agree!
The power play is just utter stupid.
The 20/40 will just encourage teams to kick more and we will end up with a rugby union style game.
|
|
|
 |
|